<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Politics on The Turbid Plaque</title>
    <link>https://turbidplaque.com/tags/politics/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Politics on The Turbid Plaque</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Alan Dove</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://turbidplaque.com/tags/politics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Political Science</title>
      <link>https://turbidplaque.com/posts/2012/2012-11-01-political-science/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://turbidplaque.com/posts/2012/2012-11-01-political-science/</guid>
      <description>As the shoutfest The Onion fittingly dubbed &amp;ldquo;The War for the White House&amp;rdquo; staggers towards its storm-soaked climax next Tuesday, there&amp;rsquo;s one fundamental question that I don&amp;rsquo;t think has really been answered yet:&#xA;Why are scientists such raving liberals?&#xA;We can&amp;rsquo;t deny that we look that way to the general public. Nature, which is to science what The Wall Street Journal is to investment banking, unabashedly endorsed President Obama for re-election.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
